Tommaso Compagnucci vs Alessandro Spadola Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining second serve points, Spadola slightly outperforms Compagnucci, winning 45.63% compared to 45.12% over the last 6 months. Could this small margin impact the final result?
• Compagnucci shows a greater efficiency in return games, capturing 46.11% of second serve return points, while Spadola stands at 43.82%. On first serve returns, Compagnucci also leads with 33.1% over Spadola's 32.47%.
• Spadola demonstrates a stronger ability to save breakpoints under pressure, securing 55.75% compared to Compagnucci's 44.71%. This could be a crucial factor if the match becomes tightly contested.
• In terms of overall match success over the past year, Compagnucci has a superior win rate of 67.21%, whereas Spadola's win rate is 61.9%.
• Compagnucci excels on clay surfaces with a 59% win rate, in contrast to their lower success rate of 36% on hard courts. Spadola achieves their highest win percentage of 59% on hard courts.
• Both players predominantly compete at the same tournament levels, though Compagnucci records a higher win rate of 71.93% at these levels compared to Spadola's 63.41%.
• Despite facing lower-ranked opponents on average, Compagnucci has still showcased solid performance in deciding sets, winning 62% in the past year. Spadola has a slightly lower deciding set win rate of 54%.
• Compagnucci's breakpoint conversion rate stands at 41.18%, while Spadola converts breakpoints more efficiently at 49.12%.

Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent form and statistical performance, both players present strengths that could influence the match outcome. Spadola shows a slight edge in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, potentially gaining critical points in high-pressure situations.

Compagnucci, however, leads in return games and overall match win percentage, suggesting a more consistent performance record. Their superior ability to win deciding sets further bolsters their resilience in extended matches.

Surface preferences could also play a role, with Compagnucci thriving on clay, where this upcoming match will be played.

Considering all factors and where the match is taking place, Compagnucci appears to have a marginal advantage and is more likely to emerge as the winner in this encounter.